MTG Commander/Elder Dragon Highlander
http://mtgcommander.net/Forum/

Mono Green Rant.
http://mtgcommander.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16700
Page 1 of 1

Author:  userbitch17 [ 2014-Feb-03 12:21 am ]
Post subject:  Mono Green Rant.

Sylvan Primordial is out. Primeval Titan is out too. Y not ban all this cycles of titan and primordial. These cards were seriously mistreated because of abusive use w/ other splash of colored decks but not on mono green decks. :facepalm: I wonder how would they compensate on mono green decks about this issue.

Author:  Joz [ 2014-Feb-03 12:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mono Green Rant.

Because all the other Primordials's triggers are "may".

Which means you have to Chose to be degenerate with them, and sometimes I choose not to hit each player with a trigger.

Unless of course its the black one; then I just go full bore on all the clones I can grab.

Author:  niheloim [ 2014-Feb-03 12:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mono Green Rant.

Meh... I'm still going to run it. Though I might pencil in the "may"

Author:  userbitch17 [ 2014-Feb-03 12:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mono Green Rant.

Isnt that a good part on sylvan? Imagine how would u tackle the "MAY" part on Diluvian primordial?

Author:  MRHblue [ 2014-Feb-03 12:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mono Green Rant.

userbitch17 wrote:
Isnt that a good part on sylvan? Imagine how would u tackle the "MAY" part on Diluvian primordial?
The blue one IS a may, and that makes it more "fair". Not having the option to leave the dude WAY behind alone it sucks. And none of the other ones destroy lands, again without may.

Author:  24x30cl [ 2014-Feb-03 2:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mono Green Rant.

come on guys, do you really believe it's about the lack of "may"? It's due to being a terrastodon which doesn't give 3/3 tokens to the victim, but lands to the victor. If it was a "may" card, you would still blow up peoples lands when they have no other targets, since it gets you a land and just basically is the better play in nearly every situation.

Author:  Shabbaman [ 2014-Feb-03 3:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mono Green Rant.

userbitch17 wrote:
I wonder how would they compensate on mono green decks about this issue.


Compensate? Why? Does this make green ramp not viable?

Author:  Epsilon [ 2014-Feb-03 3:18 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mono Green Rant.

Green needing compensation? That's a good one.

Author:  24x30cl [ 2014-Feb-03 3:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mono Green Rant.

Shabbaman wrote:
userbitch17 wrote:
I wonder how would they compensate on mono green decks about this issue.


Compensate? Why? Does this make green ramp not viable?


You should understand that banning a card is a direct attack on it's corresponding colors. The fact that the RC banned SP after also banning PT clearly illustrates the discriminatory path these people set on against greens. It started with the banning of the most Green general of all time: Rofellos. Locking him out of the game was their first act of silencing the Green-empowerment movement. These crimes are especially bad since Green has historically been an underpowered color (pre-naturalize days anyone?) and it is the worst mono-color in EDH after white, red, blue and arguably: black.

In my opinion the only way for the RC to prove that they're not racist is by adding a new affirmative action rule #16 stating:
"Each game of EDH cannot start unless Green is represented by one momo-Green general, or by at least 20% of all mono-colored cards across all decks"

Author:  Epsilon [ 2014-Feb-03 4:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mono Green Rant.

24x30cl wrote:
You should understand that banning a card is a direct attack on it's corresponding colors. The fact that the RC banned SP after also banning PT clearly illustrates the discriminatory path these people set on against greens. It started with the banning of the most Green general of all time: Rofellos. Locking him out of the game was their first act of silencing the Green-empowerment movement. These crimes are especially bad since Green has historically been an underpowered color (pre-naturalize days anyone?) and it is the worst mono-color in EDH after white, red, blue and arguably: black.

In my opinion the only way for the RC to prove that they're not racist is by adding a new affirmative action rule #16 stating:
"Each game of EDH cannot start unless Green is represented by one momo-Green general, or by at least 20% of all mono-colored cards across all decks"


The sarcasm is strong in this one... too obvious for trolling though. :(

Author:  Shabbaman [ 2014-Feb-03 4:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mono Green Rant.

Epsilon wrote:
24x30cl wrote:
You should understand that banning a card is a direct attack on it's corresponding colors. The fact that the RC banned SP after also banning PT clearly illustrates the discriminatory path these people set on against greens. It started with the banning of the most Green general of all time: Rofellos. Locking him out of the game was their first act of silencing the Green-empowerment movement. These crimes are especially bad since Green has historically been an underpowered color (pre-naturalize days anyone?) and it is the worst mono-color in EDH after white, red, blue and arguably: black.

In my opinion the only way for the RC to prove that they're not racist is by adding a new affirmative action rule #16 stating:
"Each game of EDH cannot start unless Green is represented by one momo-Green general, or by at least 20% of all mono-colored cards across all decks"


The sarcasm is strong in this one... too obvious for trolling though. :(


I can cope with it, it's coming from a crate of beer.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 7 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/